tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494675973354073448.post5012142095526989818..comments2023-09-22T02:47:30.552-05:00Comments on k-bro's baseball blog: My Take On Instant Replay In Baseball - Revisitedk-brohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11767485845479339809noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494675973354073448.post-48552631379442842942009-11-08T18:19:24.282-06:002009-11-08T18:19:24.282-06:00Preventing mistakes would clearly be better than t...Preventing mistakes would clearly be better than trying to correct them later. But...I'm not sure how to do that. <br /><br />I read somewhere that umps are poorly trained initially and, as they work their way through the minor leagues, are poorly paid and not consistently evaluated. Perhaps the training and supervision could be improved. If so, I'd favor that approach over replays.Jim H.https://www.blogger.com/profile/08221390745888733656noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494675973354073448.post-41485038016226631582009-11-06T17:35:51.002-06:002009-11-06T17:35:51.002-06:00There are so many pro and con arguments that I don...There are so many pro and con arguments that I don't know.<br />Human error has been so much a part of baseball for so long it seems like part of the game.<br />It could open a whole can of worms.lindahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03182169103361418584noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494675973354073448.post-824482249160211832009-11-06T09:38:02.337-06:002009-11-06T09:38:02.337-06:00Couldn't disagree more. The human error eleme...Couldn't disagree more. The human error element is destroying baseball. Its was ok when we didn't have the technology, but now we do. <br /><br />I like a game where the right call is made, not one based on an umpire's angled guess. If a player is out-he's out. Why would someone not mind if an ump called him safe. It is cheating. This happens all the time where everyone knows the ump made a wrong call and its BS. <br /><br /> What is worse is that the ump-feels the pressure that he made the wrong call and will make a "make-up call" to help the other team out. THis is even worse in that an ump will look for a play where he can "neglect" to make the right call. <br /><br /> The only thing nice about not having replay is that your favorite team may benefit from it from time to time. But they will also get screwed from time to time. So why not fix it and play a fair game where the right call is made. <br /><br /> I don't think the replay would slow down the game at all. It would speed it up. No more managers yelling at the umps for 10 minutes. Most replay calls could be done in 10 seconds with one replay look. Most are clear cut. Fair/foul--safe/out. Simple.<br /><br /> I like the approach that is taken from http://www.twinsballpark2010.com <br /><br />1. A fifth ump on each team is stationed at a monitor just off the playing field with access to replays from all cameras in the park. (That's a total of 15 more umps. Their union will like that and it's not all that expensive.)<br /><br />2. Managers can appeal any play (except balls and strikes) to an ump on the field who decides if a replay check is warranted. (No formal limit to the number of appeals. Abuse can result in ejection from the game.)<br /><br />3. If appealed, the replay ump renders the call by hand signal immediately. (No slowdown of the game under most circumstances.)<br /><br />4. If the replay ump sees something needing to be corrected, he communicates it to the crew chief who makes the correction on the field immediately.Heineken-77noreply@blogger.com